Gordon that first one looks like my girlfriend on a good day and the 91 looks like a wild musheroom ...................
Man i have to get off this xxxx.
Mc Bob.
Mac boost ports ..............
Moderator: Rob Voska
-
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:23 am
- Vintage Karting items owned: 1960/61 Go Kart 800 Konig FA
1961 Max-Torque Special triple
1962 Max-Torque Special dual - User Agreement: Yes
- Location: earth
Re: Mac boost ports ..............
Ted, yes, block taped, 1/4 20 x 1/4 28 studs used with .125" thick washers and NAS 6 point nuts. One thing you will never have happen again is a 10/24 center lok nut spinning around stuck on a socketcap head bolt down in the nut pocket after the nut retaining clip broke or fell out.
BTW I would never run 15% in one of my Mc-101s. That thing is just something to fool around with.
It was a blank block that needed +.030 to straighten up and I already had everything else except the Wiseco super-pro dykes/single thin ring piston. Tom
BTW I would never run 15% in one of my Mc-101s. That thing is just something to fool around with.
It was a blank block that needed +.030 to straighten up and I already had everything else except the Wiseco super-pro dykes/single thin ring piston. Tom
-
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:59 am
Re: Mac boost ports ..............
Tom, thanks for the skinny on the studs - I remember the nut clips breaking, and wedging something into the nut pocket so I could remove the head! TJ
- steveohara
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:29 am
- Vintage Karting items owned: 1969 Bug Sprint Mc 91B1
1965 Dart Gran Prix twin Mc100s
1963 Bug Scorpion ESll Mc45
Re: Mac boost ports ..............
Guys, No intent to change the subject here but Tom's comment about the nut spinning in the pocket prompted me to offer up this tip for your Mac engines..... remove the locknuts that receive the cylinder head bolts and either replace them with good quality non lock type nuts or run a tap through the nuts you take out so that the "locking" effect is eliminated or reduced to a low level. Those locking nuts can take up to as much as 25 inch pounds of torque just to turn the bolt and there is no way to assure consistent torque levels from one bolt to the other even if you are using a torque wrench. With the non locking nuts you will want to torque the head bolts to 75 inch pounds. I have never had one come loose but there is no harm in using Loctite if you are worried about it. If you have a real strong lock nut you can have as much as one third of the torque going into turning the bolt rather than applying clamping force to the head gasket. After eliminating the lock nuts I never had another head gasket problem even with the flimsy little .016" aluminim gaskets on the 91 series motors.
OK, back to the original subject
Regards,
Steve O'Hara
OK, back to the original subject
Regards,
Steve O'Hara
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:53 am
- Vintage Karting items owned: Dart A-Bone, HumBug, Macs and a Blender, Panthers.
Re: Mac boost ports ..............
I'm guessing from looking at my MC-91A that you could eliminate the web between the two boost ports, like the later MC-91B/1. This should work on the 101, but I'm not sure it would do anything other than weaken the cylinder.
The way I understand cylinder transfer porting, you have to increase the ability of the crankase to breath more in before it can pump more into the cylinder, and a tuned pipe can really increase the amount of effective charge in the cylinder. It is possible to realize a significant increase in power without altering the ports, if the right tuned pipe is used.
I have several Mac chain saw I have used through out the years cutting big 200 foot+ Ponderosa pines on my property in the San Bernardinos, and they are brutes.
I don't know high in RPM you turn your saw motors, but it would seem to me that torque would be more valued that peak HP for cutting through a log. That way, the saw would bog less as it went through the heartwood and knots. If that is the case, more dissplacement always helps. A tuned pipe can keep more charge in the cylinder, making it's effective disspalcement and torque greater.
On my saws, If I used an Azusa stack in place of the little round muffler with spark arrestor, the saw had less torque and bogged down easier. It seems the back pressure of the muffler helped the saw's torque.
The way I understand cylinder transfer porting, you have to increase the ability of the crankase to breath more in before it can pump more into the cylinder, and a tuned pipe can really increase the amount of effective charge in the cylinder. It is possible to realize a significant increase in power without altering the ports, if the right tuned pipe is used.
I have several Mac chain saw I have used through out the years cutting big 200 foot+ Ponderosa pines on my property in the San Bernardinos, and they are brutes.
I don't know high in RPM you turn your saw motors, but it would seem to me that torque would be more valued that peak HP for cutting through a log. That way, the saw would bog less as it went through the heartwood and knots. If that is the case, more dissplacement always helps. A tuned pipe can keep more charge in the cylinder, making it's effective disspalcement and torque greater.
On my saws, If I used an Azusa stack in place of the little round muffler with spark arrestor, the saw had less torque and bogged down easier. It seems the back pressure of the muffler helped the saw's torque.